The gloves are off, the great monopoly formerly known as Microsoft.
Almost every day since the publication of an article titled, “Microsoft, You Suck”, I have received ignorant comment SPAM from Microsoft employees posting using Microsoft IP addresses and Hotmail accounts. These “comments” come in two forms: (1) calling me stupid and (2) pointing out the many “great needs” for Microsoft products. Despite a flood of poorly worded and insulting comment SPAM, I remained silent, even approving some of the corporate drool to appear as comments on the site.
Hey, Microsoft, I may be stupid, but you are the “stupidester,” using the language from one of your unpublished comments. Why?
FIRST: You actually have minions crawling the internet to post idiotic comments using words like “stupidester” INSTEAD OF FIXING YOUR BUG-LADEN, OVERWEIGHT, AND POORLY DESIGNED PRODUCTS! In case you missed it from your ivory tower, “the customer is king,” and, by the way, the have a lot of better options that your bloatware: Apple and Ubuntu are two. Every single person at Microsoft should be focused on fixing the products, not defending a mistake. Smart people apologize, fix the mistakes, and move on. Stupid people don’t even realize that they made a mistake…
SECOND: It is possible that the remaining smart Microsfters know that Vista and Office 2008 are both bloated mistakes, harping to a forgone era like the landline in telecom. These “smart people” can justify all mistakes by showing the vast sums of money these ghastly error-prone products generate, which they do, since they are produced by a monopoly, just like the phone companies of old. So, given ALL of the great sums of money that your crapware generates, your stock must generate equity returns, right? Wrong. Microsoft stock has not generated equity value in approximately 10 YEARS! It’s like you added no value to the world since 1998, joining a sad cast of characters that includes the artist formerly known as Prince. The great monopoly formerly known as Microsoft. Embarrassing.

THIRD: Let us not forget the awe-inspiring intelligence behind the product itself: Vista and Office 2008. We can all agree that writing software is hard. One would hope that you would be the BEST IN THE WORLD AT IT. Sadly, a loose federation of volunteer programmers has kicked your ass in the operating system world: Ubuntu. It works with most hardware, has a lot of whizz-bang features, but, best of all, the entire operating system and every application that you would ever want are 100% free. Even if it were bloated and crash-prone, which it is not, the fact that it is free makes it better than the overpriced Vista. But, wait, Ubuntu even runs Windows application for FREE using Wine. Go ahead. Comment SPAM me with messages pointing out the many problems with a UNIX based operating system, but add a little more consumer-facing polish and you have the Leaopard OS, which is also kicking your ass. It’s not about numbers, Mr. Softie, it’s about trend lines, and your trend lines suck.
FOURTH: So, according to trend lines, you’re losing the browser war. So, you’re losing share in the operating system market. You can’t seem to get your online offerings off the ground. BUT, great companies would still want to be acquired by this monopolistic cash hoarding beast, right? Wrong. Struggling public companies (Yahoo!) and start-ups alike (Xobni) are turning down your acquisition offers paid in cash at a premium. Hey, you did manage to acquire “the Enron of Scandinavia.” But, I digress, a little start-up turned you down for a cash offer. Huh?
The sad and scary part of all of this is that there is so much more to say about the stupid mistakes that you have made. Call me stupid all you want, but I have a really low bar to cross with you as a role model before your insults will really concern me.
Now, instead of diving into more obvious tales of stupidity, let’s take a look at your “smart” arguments defending Microsoft bloatware, which all circle around “needing to work offline.” You need to work on an airplane, right? Professionals need to work in the field, right? Of course they do, but that is a terrible argument to defend bloated local applications that store files in giant proprietary formats.
Using Google Gears, FireFox 3, or the new Adobe products, any developer can easily create web applications with a healthy offline experience to serve professionals in the field. But, architecting applications with offline access is not even necessary in the vast majority of cases. When was the last time that the average working professional traveled to a region where there was absolutely no cellular access? AND, where there is cellular access, there is ultimately connectivity. Soon enough, this will include planes. Soon enough, laptops will have chips that provide them with access to the cellular networks everywhere else. Technology evolves. Microsoft does not, apparently.
I know many smart people at Microsoft, and I respect them, too. Before you insult me, make a good product and build a half decent company. Back to the work of building great things… You should join me, Microsoft.